Went to the first night of the "afropunk" weekend festival at the Brooklyn Academy of Music theater tonight to see the eponymous film with A--. If you want more information it can be found
here. Apparently they have a huge community of people getting black hardcore and punk bands in front of largely black or at least blacker-than-usual audiences.
The film covers some challenging ground. What I found most educational was how many young black kids who get into punk are basically attacked by the black community for either a) acting white b) rejecting middle-class privilege or c) being a "satanist," devil-worshipper, whatever. There was one guy who has become a very well-known drummer who told a story about how he had scored a job as a banker on Wall Street and then left it to be a musician. His parents were howling over "the benefits" he was giving up. Oh!!!! And some of these kids said they don't even talk to their parents anymore....
In a certain sense, none of this is entirely new. I mean, I've heard lots of the same kinds of things from white punks and have even gone through some of the same shit myself at a certain age. But what's probably different is that the parents, especially if they are middle-class parents--have more to lose. Or, more precisely, they had more to overcome in order to get up to where they are. And so to have their kids shave all their hair except for one giant green dreadlock in the center of their forehead and try to make a career out of screaming on the stage is especially painful.
But James Spooner, who directed the film, is now using it as a sort of counseling tool to build community for the black music counterculture. I think this is awesome. Whatever the weaknesses of the film (and there are a few), it sucks for somebody to feel that they can't experiment with the underground because their back is against the wall due to their race. Or that you have to listen to hip-hop to prove to everybody that you're really black. Bringing these issues into the open is good.
Several times during the film, the audience's reactions were interesting. Once was when Moe Mitchell, the singer for Cipher, said "My music isn't for white people at all" while footage showed him playing to an apparently all-white audience. That got a few chuckles from the peanut gallery. Actually I felt that particular juxtaposition of audio and viddie was a tad hostile to Mr. Mitchell, but yeah, the point stands. It's especially weird that all the lyrics are about Black Power.
Another strange moment was when this California woman who's prominently featured in the film but who I'll here just refer to as M-- goes on a long shpiel about how she doesn't date black men because her parents love her and "actually live in a nice neighborhood" and they all sell drugs anyway. That got actual gasps. Again, I felt the director was hostile to his subject here. I'm willing to bet that M-- is not pleased with how she's represented in the film and her comments are taken out of context. Plus, they bring up the invisible zeppelin in the room: class. As A-- pointed out, class is at the root of the definition of punk when we think of how it originated in the UK slums. So what does it mean to make a film about punk where we don't mention class and focus only on race--not even to contextualize comments like those above, and from what I could see the afropunk movement tends to be pretty middle-class?
Yeah. So, class would add a lot. But, leaving that to the side for now, I think the film is rad and the movement coming out of it is potentially liberating. See
Afropunk if you get the chance.
J